Wednesday, 22 January 2025

MUPPET SHOW REMAKE

 Is 2025 a remake of the Muppet Show?

The original Muppet Show wasn't a psyop (at least I don't think it was, although Miss Piggy may have had a secret agenda), it was a puppet show that had much in common with the current American circus show. 

 The Muppet Show was known for its uniquely designed characters, burlesque nature, slapstick, sometimes absurdist and surreal humour, and parodies. Kermit the Frog (performed by Donald Trump) acted as showrunner and host, who tried to maintain control of the overwhelming antics of the other Muppet characters, as well as appeasing the rotating slate of guest stars. As The Muppet Show became popular, many celebrities were eager to perform with the Muppets on television.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Muppet_Show 

We are only three weeks into the new year, and already the ongoing psyops have all been ramped up to new levels, while an entire collection of new characters and story lines have already been introduced for this season.

Tuesday, 21 January 2025

REVISITING THE BEATLES

As a music fan and a “conspiracy theorist” I've long been confused and conflicted about The Beatles. Maybe part of what keeps pulling me back to look at them is that I know I have never fully understood this story, but I suspect that it ties into almost every deep state cover up for the past 60 years.

And another aspect is that despite living on the opposite side of the globe (I’m not a flat earther), my mother was from Liverpool, and I spent some time there staying with relatives as a child. People I spoke to who lived there in the early 60’s never saw or heard of them back then, and were stunned when they became “bigger than Jesus” all around the world.

image.png

On the one hand I think they performed some of the greatest pop songs ever written. They have influenced most of my favourite bands – everyone from Split Enz to Joy Division. But my favourite Beatles track, “Rain” was never even on an album…

2022-10-22_124535.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=cK5G8fPmWeA

On the other hand I hate some of their music as much as any music I’ve ever heard. For example, I think the album “Sgt. Peppers Lonely Heart’s Club Band” is horrible – really creepy. And that is just based on the music, let alone the fact that it’s filled with satanic and deep state references from the cover to the final track.

image.png

They put out all sorts of amazing and really advanced music, but as soon as you start delving into the rabbit hole that is The Beatles, the cover ups and mismatched stories are endless.

image.png

There are so many conflicting theories it’s hard to know where to start. But here are three things I am certain of. There was more than one person playing the role of “Paul McCartney”, they did not write nor play all the music that is credited to them, and John Lennon was not assassinated in 1980.

2022-10-22_123517.jpg

http://mileswmathis.com/paul8.pdf

2022-10-22_123534.jpg

http://mileswmathis.com/lennon.pdf

image.png

Monday, 20 January 2025

TRUMP MEMECOIN

Trump has released a meme coin - it has only just been released and is being pumped to the moon
 
Forking out for this stupid coin is a wild gamble. What a scam! - they released 200 million of them, so at it's peak price of US$65 each they created US$1.3 billion out of nothing but hype for worthless meme coin.
 
 
I must admit I probably made a bad call saying it was a joke at US$39 yesterday, as it rose another 65% after I said it was a worthless scam last night - up from US$39 to US$65

Previously I was expecting it to peak at around US$50 then trigger a sell off and drop back to about US$20

But ultimately it's another meme coin scam so sooner or later the price will drop back and when it does it will drop fast.

When that will happen is pure guess work. I am generally a crypto pessimist so I was expecting it to happen within a day or two from the outset, but the crash could be anywhere from one day right up to four years. I'm confident it won't last beyond Trump's four year term, (and I'm also confident this will be Trump's last term)

I'm still thinking if it ever gets up to US$100 that will trigger a sell off and am still expecting it to crash before the end of this month. I wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole but I do think the Solana blockchain that all these meme coin scams are based on is worth a look.

 
Trump is also selling shoes, watches, and bibles. The Trump shoes look awesome 🙂 You can really see his WWF Hulk Hogan 80's roots here! Such a stylish dude.
 
 
PS - Since writing this post half an hour ago, TRUMP coin has just dropped from US$65 down to US$47. Meme coins are a wild ride...
 
 

Sunday, 19 January 2025

CAN'T FIX STUPID

 Even by the standards of regular vaxtards this is a spectacular example of delusion and mind control.

If this is actually for real and not satire, it shows just how far some normies have devolved, and is another example of the desperate attempts by mainstream propaganda media like "The Sydney Morning Herald" to keep normalising the deranged delusions of normies.

 
1.I had a suspected mild heart attack just over two years ago.
“Probably just a reaction to the COVID vaccine,” a series of medicos cheerfully informed me,
.........
2. Whatever caused that coronary blip, I had no regrets about getting vaccinated. I haven’t wavered.
.........
3. I have been back to the ED five times since with heart issues.
.........
4.I know several friends and family who have suffered similar disorders.
........
5.I was more than OK being one of the walking “vaccine injured,” convincing myself I was part of that glum utilitarian idiom: the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
.................
6.But now I’m getting sicker. I was recently diagnosed with an autoimmune disease called hemolytic anemia. It’s a disorder in which red blood cells are destroyed faster than they can be made.It can be fatal if undiagnosed but very curable if caught early.
One of the main symptoms is fatigue and brain fog. I’ve found myself pointing the TV remote at the fridge and pouring myself a bowl of cat biscuits thinking it’s cereal.
.............
7. Just to be abundantly clear: I am pro-vax. I didn’t have one nanosecond of doubt about the importance of getting the jab, not only for myself but for my loved ones.
............
8.History is littered with illogical moments, but folk refusing to get inoculated against COVID would be one of humanity’s dumber choices.
...........
 
This is not actually the same guy but there seems to be a pattern here - beards are deadly
 

 

This sort of thing actually can happen to people without beards as well, doctors are baffled but some experts believe it is a result of climate change.

 

Saturday, 18 January 2025

ESKIMO DIET

 This classic artical from 1935 shows clearly why vegans are barking up the wrong tree:

 Eskimos Prove An All-Meat Diet Provides Excellent Health

    By Vilhjalmur Stefansson - Harper’s Monthly Magazine, November 1935.

Part I

In 1906 I went to the Arctic with the food tastes and beliefs of the average American. By 1918, after eleven years as an Eskimo among Eskimos, I had learned things which caused me to shed most of those beliefs. Ten years later I began to realize that what I had learned was going to influence materially the sciences of medicine and dietetics. However, what finally impressed the scientists and converted many during the last two or three years, was a series of confirmatory experiments upon myself and a colleague performed at Bellevue Hospital, New York City, under the supervision of a committee representing several universities and other organizations.

Not so long ago the following dietetic beliefs were common: To be healthy you need a varied diet, composed of elements from both the animal and vegetable kingdoms. You got tired of and eventually felt a revulsion against things if you had to eat them often. This latter belief was supported by stories of people who through force of circumstances had been compelled, for instance, to live for two weeks on sardines and crackers and who, according to the stories, had sworn that so long as they lived they never would touch sardines again. The Southerners had it that nobody can eat a quail a day for thirty days.

There were subsidiary dietetic views. It was desirable to eat fruits and vegetables, including nuts and coarse grains. The less meat you ate the better for you. If you ate a good deal of it, you would develop rheumatism, hardening of the arteries, and high blood pressure, with a tendency to breakdown of the kidneys – in short, premature old age. An extreme variant had it that you would live more healthy, happily, and longer if you became a vegetarian.

Specifically it was believed, when our field studies began, that without vegetables in your diet you would develop scurvy. It was a “known fact” that sailors, miners, and explorers frequently died of scurvy “because they did not have vegetables and fruits.” This was long before Vitamin C was publicized.

The addition of salt to food was considered either to promote health or to be necessary for health. This is proved by various yarns, such as that African tribes make war on one another to get salt; that minor campaigns of the American Civil War were focused on salt mines; and that all herbivorous animals are ravenous for salt. I do not remember seeing a critical appendix to any of these views, suggesting for instance, that Negro tribes also make war about things which no one ever said were biological essentials of life; that tobacco was a factor in Civil War campaigns without being a dietetic essential; and that members of the deer family in Maine which never have salt or show desire for it, are as healthy as those in Montana which devour quantities of it and are forever seeking more.

A belief I was destined to find crucial in my Arctic work, making the difference between success and failure, life and death, was the view that man cannot live on meat alone. The few doctors and dietitians who thought you could were considered unorthodox if not charlatans. The arguments ranged from metaphysics to chemistry: Man was not intended to be carnivorous – you knew that from examining his teeth, his stomach, and the account of him in the Bible. As mentioned, he would get scurvy if he had no vegetables in meat. The kidneys would be ruined by overwork. There would be protein poisoning and, in general hell to pay.

With these views in my head and, deplorably, a number of others like them, I resigned my position as assistant instructor in anthropology at Harvard to become anthropologist of a polar expedition. Through circumstances and accidents which are not a part of the story, I found myself that autumn the guest of the Mackenzie River Eskimos.

The Hudson’s Bay Company, whose most northerly post was at Fort McPherson two hundred miles to the south had had little influence on the Eskimos during more than half a century; for it was only some of them who made annual visits to the trading post; and then they purchased no food but only tea, tobacco, ammunition and things of that sort. But in 1889 the whaling fleet had begun to cultivate these waters and for fifteen years there had been close association with sometimes as many as a dozen ships and four to five hundred men wintering at Herschel Island, just to the west of the delta. During this time a few of the Eskimos had learned some English and perhaps one in ten of them had grown to a certain extent fond of white man’s foods.

But now the whaling fleet was gone because the bottom had dropped out of the whalebone market, and the district faced an old-time winter of fish and water. The game, which might have supplemented the fish some years earlier, had been exterminated or driven away by the intensive hunting that supplied meat to the whaling fleet. There was a little tea, but not nearly enough to see the Eskimos through the winter – this was the only element of the white man’s dietary of which they were really fond and the lack of which would worry them. So I was facing a winter of fish without tea. For the least I could do, an uninvited guest, was to pretend a dislike for it.

The issue of fish and water against fish and tea was, in any case, to me six against a half dozen. For I had had a prejudice against fish all my life. I had nibbled at it perhaps once or twice a year at course dinners, always deciding that it was as bad as I thought. This was pure psychology of course, but I did not realize it.

I was in a measure adopted into an Eskimo family the head of which knew English. He had grown up as a cabin boy on a whaling ship and was called Roxy, though his name was Memoranna. It was early September, we were living in tents, the days were hot but it had begun to freeze during the nights, which were now dark for six to eight hours.

The community of three or four families, fifteen or twenty individuals, was engaged in fishing. With long poles, three or four nets were shoved out from the beach about one hundred yards apart. When the last net was out the first would be pulled in, with anything from dozens to hundreds of fish, mostly ranging in weight from one to three pounds, and including some beautiful salmon trout. From knowledge of other white men the Eskimos consider these to be most suitable for me and would cook them specially, roasting them against the fire. They themselves ate boiled fish.

Trying to develop an appetite, my habit was to get up soon after daylight, say four o’clock, shoulder my rifle, and go off after breakfasts on a hunt south across the rolling prairie, though I scarcely expected to find any game. About the middle of the afternoon I would return to camp. Children at play usually saw me coming and reported to Roxy’s wife, who would then put a fresh salmon trout to roast. When I got home I would nibble at it and write in my diary what a terrible time I was having.

Against my expectation, and almost against my will, I was beginning to like the baked salmon trout when one day of perhaps the second week I arrived home without the children having seen me coming. There was no baked fish ready but the camp was sitting round troughs of boiled fish. I joined them and, to my surprise, liked it better than the baked. There after the special cooking ceased, and I ate boiled fish with the Eskimos.

Part II

By midwinter I had left my cabin-boy host and, for the purposes of anthropological study, was living with a less sophisticated family at the eastern edge of the Mackenzie delta. Our dwelling was a house of wood and earth, heated and lighted with Eskimo-style lamps. They burned seal or whale oil, mostly white whale from a hunt of the previous spring when the fat had been stored in bags and preserved, although the lean meat had been eaten. Our winter cooking however, was not done over the lamps but on a sheet-iron stove which had been obtained from whalers. There were twenty-three of us living in one room, and there were sometimes as many as ten visitors. The floor was then so completely covered with sleepers that the stove had to be suspended from the ceiling. The temperature at night was round 60*F. The ventilation was excellent through cold air coming up slowly from below by way of a trap door that was never closed and the heated air going out by a ventilator in the roof.

Everyone slept completely naked – no pajama or night shirts. We used cotton or woolen blankets which had been obtained from the whalers and from the Hudson’s Bay Company.

In the morning, about seven o’clock, winter-caught fish, frozen so hard that they would break like glass, were brought in to lie on the floor till they began to soften a little. One of the women would pinch them every now and then until, when she found her finger indented them slightly, she would begin preparations for breakfast. First she cut off the head and put them aside to be boiled for the children in the afternoon (Eskimos are fond of children, and heads are considered the best part of the fish). Next best are the tails, which are cut off and saved for the children also. The woman would then slit the skin along the back and also along the belly and getting hold with her teeth, would strip the fish somewhat as we peel a banana, only sideways where we peel bananas, endways.

Thus prepared, the fish were put on dishes and passed around. Each of us took one and gnawed it about as an American does corn on the cob. An American leaves the cob; similarly we ate the flesh from the outside of the fish, not touching the entrails. When we had eaten as much as we chose, we put the rest on a tray for dog feed.

After breakfast all the men and about half the women would go fishing, the rest of the women staying at home to keep house. About eleven o’clock we came back for a second meal of frozen fish just like the breakfast. At about four in the afternoon the working day was over and we came home to a meal of hot boiled fish.

Also we came home to a dwelling so heated by the cooking that the temperature would range from 85* to 100*F. or perhaps even higher – more like our idea of a Turkish bath than a warm room. Streams of perspiration would run down our bodies, and the children were kept busy going back and forth with dippers of cold water of which we naturally drank great quantities.

Just before going to sleep we would have a cold snack of fish that had been left over from dinner. Then we slept seven or eight hours and the routine of the day began once more.

After some three months as a guest of the Eskimos I had acquired most of their food tastes. I had to agree that fish is better boiled than cooked any other way, and that the heads (which we occasionally shared with the children) were the best part of the fish. I no longer desired variety in the cooking, such as occasional baking – I preferred it always boils if it was cooked. I had become as fond of raw fish as if I had been a Japanese. I like fermented (therefore slightly acid) whale oil with my fish as well as ever I liked mixed vinegar and olive oil with a salad. But I still had two reservations against Eskimo practice; I did not eat rotten fish and I longed for salt with my meals.

There were several grades of decayed fish. The August catch had been protected by longs from animals but not from heat and was outright rotten. The September catch was mildly decayed. The October and later catches had been frozen immediately and were fresh. There was less of the August fish than of any other and, for that reason among the rest, it was a delicacy – eaten sometimes as a snack between meals, sometimes as a kind of dessert and always frozen, raw.

In midwinter it occurred to me to philosophize that in our own and foreign lands taste for a mild cheese is somewhat plebeian; it is at least a semi-truth that connoisseurs like their cheeses progressively stronger. The grading applies to meats, as in England where it is common among nobility and gentry to like game and pheasant so high that the average Midwestern American or even Englishman of a lower class, would call them rotten.

I knew of course that, while it is good form to eat decayed milk products and decayed game, it is very bad form to eat decayed fish. I knew also that the view of our populace that there are likely to be “ptomaines” in decaying fish and in the plebeian meats; but it struck me as an improbable extension of the class-consciousness that ptomaines would avoid the gentleman’s food and attack that of a commoner.

These thoughts led to a summarizing query; If it is almost a mark of social distinction to be able to eat strong cheeses with a straight face and smelly birds with relish, why is it necessarily a low taste to be fond of decaying fish? On that basis of philosophy, though with several qualms, I tried the rotten fish one day, and if memory servers, like it better than my first taste of Camembert. During the next weeks I became fond of rotten fish.

About the fourth month of my first Eskimo winter I was looking forward to every meal (rotten or fresh), enjoying them, and feeling comfortable when they were over. Still I kept thinking the boiled fish would taste better if only I had salt. From the beginning of my Eskimo residence I had suffered from this lack. On one of the first few days, with the resourcefulness of a Boy Scout, I had decided to make myself some salt, and had boiled sea water till there was left only a scum of brown powder. If I had remembered as vividly my freshman chemistry as I did the books about shipwrecked adventurers, I should have know in advance that the sea contains a great many chemicals besides sodium chloride, among them iodine. The brown scum tasted bitter rather than salty. A better chemist could no doubt have refined the product. I gave it up, partly through the persuasion of my host, the English-speaking Roxy.

The Mackenzie Eskimos, Roxy told me, believe that what is good for grown people is good for children and enjoyed by them as soon as they get used to it. Accordingly they teach the use of tobacco when a child is very young. It then grows to maturity with the idea that you can’t get along without tobacco. But, said Roxy, the whalers have told that many whites get along without it, and he had himself seen white men who never use it, while the few white women, wives of captains, none used tobacco. (This, remember, was in 1906.)

Now Roxy had heard that white people believe that salt is good for, and even necessary for children, so they begin early to add salt to the child’s food. That child then would grow up with the same attitude toward salt as an Eskimo has toward tobacco. However, said Roxy, since we Eskimos were mistaken in thinking tobacco so necessary, may it be that the white men are mistaken about salt? Pursuing the argument, he concluded that the reason why all Eskimos dislike salted food and all white men like it was not racial but due to custom. You could then, break the salt habit as easily as the tobacco habit and you would suffer no ill result beyond the mental discomfort of the first few days or weeks.

Roxy did not know, but I did as an anthropologist, that in pre-Columbian times salt was unknown or the taste of it disliked and the use of it avoided through much of North and South America. It may possibly be true that the carnivorous Eskimos in whose language the word salty, mamaitok, is synonymous with with evil-tasting, disliked salt more intensely than those Indians who were partly herbivorous. Nevertheless, it is clear that the salt habit spread more slowly through the New World from the Europeans than the tobacco habit through Europe from the Indians. Even today there are considerable areas, for instance in the Amazon basin, where the natives still abhor salt. Not believing that the races differ in their basic natures, I felt inclined to agree with Roxy that the practice of slating food is with us a social inheritance and the belief in its merits a part of our folklore.

Through this philosophizing I was somewhat reconciled to going without salt, but I was nevertheless, overjoyed when one day Ovayuak, my new host in the eastern delta, came indoors to say that a dog team was approaching which he believed to be that of Ilavinirk, a man who had worked with whalers and who possessed a can of salt. Sure enough, it was Ilavinirk, and he was delighted to give me the salt, a half-pound baking-powder can about half full, which he said he had been carrying around for two or three years, hoping sometime to meet someone who would like it for a present. He seemed almost as pleased to find that I wanted the salt as I was to get it. I sprinkled some on my boiled fish, enjoyed it tremendously, and wrote in my diary that it was the best meal I had had all winter. Then I put the can under my pillow, in the Eskimo way of keeping small and treasured things. But at the next meal I had almost finished eating before I remembered the salt. Apparently then my longing for it had been what you might call imaginary. I finished without salt, tried it at one or two meals during the next few days and thereafter left it untouched. When we moved camp the salt remained behind.

After the return of the sun I made a journey of several hundred miles to the ship Narwhal which, contrary to our expectations of the late summer, had really come in and wintered at Herschel Island. The captain was George P. Leavitt, of Portland, Maine. For the few days of my visit I enjoyed the excellent New England cooking, but when I left Herschel Island I returned without reluctance to the Eskimo meals of fish and cold water. It seemed to me that, mentally and physically, I had never been in better health in my life.

Part III

During the first few months of my first year in the Arctic, I acquired, though I did not at the time fully realize it, the munitions of fact and experience which have within my own mind defeated those views of dietetics reviewed at the beginning of this article. I could be healthy on a diet of fish and water. The longer I followed it the better I liked it, which meant, at least inferentially and provisionally, that you never become tired of your food if you have only one thing to eat. I did not get scurvy on the fish diet nor learn that any of my fish-eating friends ever had it. Nor was the freedom from scurvy due to the fish being eaten raw – we proved that later. (What it was due to we shall deal with in the second article of this series.) There were certainly no signs of hardening of the arteries and high blood pressure, of breakdown of the kidneys or of rheumatism.

These months on fish were the beginning of several years during which I lived on an exclusive meat diet. For I count in fish when I speak of living on meat, using “meat” and “meat diet” more as a professor of anthropology than as the editor of a housekeeping magazine. The term in this article and in like scientific discussions refers to a diet from which all things of the vegetable kingdom are absent.

To the best of my estimate then, I have lived in the Arctic for more than five years exclusively on meat and water. (This was not, of course, one five-year stretch, but an aggregate of that much time during ten years.) One member of my expeditions, Storker Storkersen, lived on an exclusive meat diet for about the same length of time while there are several who have lived on it from one to three years. These have been of many nationalities and of three races – ordinary European whites; natives of the Cape Verde Islands, who had a large percentage of Negro blood; and natives of the South Sea Islands. Neither from experience with my own men nor from what I have heard of similar cases do I find any racial difference. There are marked individual differences.

The typical method of breaking a party into a meat diet is that three of five of us leave in midwinter a base camp which has nearly or quite the best type of European mixed diet that money and forethought can provide. The novices have been told that it is possible to live on meat alone. We warn them that it is hard to get used to for the first few weeks, but assure them that eventually they will grow to like it and that any difficulties in changing diets will be due to their imagination.

These assertions the men will believe to a varying degree. I have a feeling that in the course of breaking in something like twenty individuals; two or three young men believed me completely, and that this belief collaborated strongly with their youth and adaptability in making them take readily to the meat.

Usually I think, the men believe that what I tell of myself is true for me personally, but that I am peculiar, a freak – that a normal person will not react similarly, and that they are going to be normal and have an awful time. Their past experience seems to tell them that if you eat one thing every day you are bound to tire of it. In the back of their minds there is also what they have read and heard about the necessity for a varied diet. They have specific fears of developing the ailments which they have heard of as caused by meat or prevented by vegetables.

We secure our food in the Arctic by hunting and in midwinter there is not enough good hunting light. Accordingly we carry with us from the base camp provisions for several weeks, enough to take us into the long days. During this time, as we travel away from shore, we occasionally kill a seal or a polar bear and eat their meat along with our groceries. Our men like these as an element of a mixed diet as well as you do beef or mutton.

We are not on rations. We eat all we want, and we feed the dogs what we think is good for them. When the traveling conditions are right we usually have two big meals a day, morning and evening, but when we are storm bound or delayed by open water we eat several meals to pass the time away. At the end of four, six or eight weeks at sea, we have used up all our food. We do not try to save a few delicacies to eat with the seal and bear, for experience has proved that such things are only tantalizing.

Suddenly, then we are on nothing but seal. For while our food at sea averages ten percent polar bear there may be months in which we don’t see a bear. The men go at the seal loyally; they are volunteers and whatever the suffering, they have bargained for it and intend to grin and bear it. For a day or two they eat square meals. Then the appetite begins to flag and they discover as they had more than half expected, that for them personally it is going to be a hard pull or a failure. Some own up that they can’t eat, while others pretend to have good appetites, enlisting the surreptitious help of a dog to dispose of their share. In extreme cases, which are usually those of the middle-aged and conservative they go two or three days practically or entirely without eating. We had no weighing apparatus; but I take it that some have lost anything from ten to twenty pounds, what with the hard work on empty stomachs. They become gloomy and grouchy and, as I once wrote, “They begin to say to each other, and sometimes to me, things about their judgment in joining a polar expedition that I cannot quote.”

But after a few days even the conservatives begin to nibble at the seal meat, after a few more they are eating a good deal of it, rather under protest and at the end of three or four weeks they are eating square meals, though still talking about their willingness to give a soul or right arm for this or that. Amusingly, or perhaps instructively, they often long for ham and eggs or corned beef when, according to theory, they ought to be longing for vegetables and fruits. Some of them do hanker particularly for things like sauerkraut or orange juice; but more usually it is for hot cakes and syrup or bread and butter.

There are two ways in which to look at an abrupt change of diet – how difficult it is to get used to what you have to eat and how hard it is to be deprived of things you are used to and like. From the second angle, I take it to be physiologically significant that we have found our people, when deprived, to long equally for things which have been considered necessities of health, such as salt; for things where a drug addiction is considered to be involved, such as tobacco; and for items of that class of so-called staple foods, such as bread.

It has happened on several trips, and with an aggregate of perhaps twenty men, that they have had to break at one time their salt, tobacco, and bread habits. I have frequently tried the experiment of asking which they would prefer; salt for their meal, bread with it, or tobacco for an after-dinner smoke. In nearly every case the men have stopped to consider, nor do I recall that they were ever unanimous.

When we are returning to the ship after several months on meat and water, I usually say that the steward will have orders to cook separately for each member of the party all he wants of whatever he wants. Especially during the last two or three days, there is a great deal of talk among the novices in the part about what the choices are to be. One man wants a big dish of mashed potatoes and gravy; another a gallon of coffee and bread and butter; a third perhaps wants a stack of hot cakes with syrup and butter.

On reaching the ship each does get all he wants of what he wants. The food tastes good, although not quite so superlative as they had imagined. They have said they are going to eat a lot and they do. Then they get indigestion, headache, feel miserable, and within a week, in nine cases out of ten of those who have been on meat six months or over, they are willing to go back to meat again. If a man does not want to take part in a second sledge journey it is usually for a reason other than the dislike of meat.

Still, as just implied, the verdict depends on how long you have been on the diet. If at the end of the first ten days our men could have been miraculously rescued from the seal and brought back to their varied foods, most of them would have sworn forever after that they were about to die when rescued, and they would have vowed never to taste seal again – vows which would have been easy to keep for no doubt in such cases the thought of seal, even years later, would have been accompanied by a feeling of revulsion. If a man has been on meat exclusively for only three or four months he may or may not be reluctant to go back to it again. But if the period has been six months or over, I remember no one who was unwilling to go back to meat. Moreover, those who have gone without vegetables for an aggregate of several years usually thereafter eat a larger percentage of meat than your average citizen, if they can afford it.

Ketogenic diet and Vitamin C | The truth about food

http://www.biblelife.org/stefansson1.html

http://www.vintag.es/2012/08/old-photos-of-eskimos.html


Friday, 17 January 2025

PINE vs. NUDE

In these times of relentless FUDPORN we need to pay attention to the stream of utter crap that is being loaded into our brains. Two acronyms I have come up with to remind myself of that:

PINE - Positive, Inspiring, Necessary, Entertaining
NUDE - Negative, Unnecessary, Doubting, Eunuch
 

Thursday, 16 January 2025

FAKE LA FIRE GALLERY

Yesterday I did a post questioning whether the photos of the LA fires were authentic.

I didn't say were no fires, in fact I specifically said "there may really have been some fires"

My main point is that the LA fires are a massive psyop, and that most of the images being posted online are CGI (Computer Generated Images). I didn't say ALL the photos online are fake, but I did say that at least 90% of them are.

 

 
After having another look around online today I still stand by that seemingly outrageous claim - almost every picture I've found using either Duckduckgo or Yandex search engines looks to be clearly fake. And the few that look real do not show massive destruction, but much smaller scale fires.

As well as sharing the post online I also sent it out to some of my friends, hoping to get some responses.  And I did get a few replies, including several who have friends or family that live in LA. So I asked them if they had any photos. I still hope to get some, but so far haven't received any.

What I'm looking for ideally, are original photos (not videos) taken by people known personally to my friends (rather than images found online). Preferably with some back story and information such as time and location.

Meanwhile to provide some evidence to back up my deranged claim that most of the images are fake, I've now posted a gallery of 50 LA fire images that I think are all CGI images rather than authentic photos.



LA FIRES FAKE CGI IMAGES

Wednesday, 15 January 2025

LA FIRE PSYOP

 If the LA fires are real why are almost all the photos fake? Essentially it's the perfect example of a psyop catering for every possible audience, from the "climate change is causing mass destruction" level mind programed normie sheeple, through to the "Zionist controlled deep state military laser weapons have been used to deliberately destroy LA and replace it with a globalist smart city" not quite up to full speed truthers.

But what none of the dozen or more narratives address is the elephant in the room: Where are the real photos? Are we supposed to believe that in a city of over 3.8 million there are no photographers with decent cameras?

The entire internet is flooded with images of fires, burned out buildings and melted cars, but most of them are obvious fakes. 

 
Some of the CGI pictures are quite arty looking. Fortunately this man's clothing and shoes are nice and clean, if he had gotten ash on his white shoe soles he would have been having a really bad day. And at least his face mask should keep him safe from bird flu.

 
It's lucky American flags are fireproof for that patriotic Iwo Jima / fake Trump assassination photo look


And it's a good job palm trees don't burn, or it could have been really messy down by the beach!


Most of the overhead pictures are low resolution. Clearly drones still use late 90's digital camera technology. The photos of the fake nuclear bombings from WW2 were actually far better than this, but as with the moon landings, I guess technology has been going backwards for the past century.


 After 911 it took more than a decade for some people to grasp that steel doesn't melt in fires. But sadly that hard won lesson has already been forgotten and steel cars are now supposedly melting all over the place. Usually right next to trees that are still in surprisingly good shape. But trees don't burn as easily as steel do they?. And the plastic lids on rubbish skips are fireproof, but cars just go poof...

 
Like wooden power poles, LA trees are remarkably resilient to temperatures that melt steel cars. The smoke from fires usually covers everything around in a thick coating of dirty black ash, but in LA, walls and driveways all seem to remain spotlessly clean, as do lost dogs that have been miraculously reunited with their owners after being lost in the fires for two days.

 
Rob Braxman posts a lot of good content, but what on earth is he actually showing in this video filmed from his boat?
 
He starts out under pristine bright blue sky talking about how the ash has been making everything dirty. But his immaculate white boat is absolutely spotless.

 
There are some passengers onboard wearing face masks, but he says he can't smell anything himself. He sails to a beachfront area that has reportedly been devastated. But he can't go close enough to shore to get a decent look at the devastation because the water there is only 30 foot (10m) deep. 
 
 
His boat is quite a decent size but it's not a cruise liner. Small cruise liners do require a depth of at least 10m, but yachts do not.

He is a multi millionaire tech expert but he hasn't got a camera with enough of a zoom lens to actually show anything clearly? Maybe he was filming the video on his cell phone, but personally, if I was going to go to all the trouble to film the coast, I would have taken a camera with a zoom lens. 
 
If I could afford a big yacht I would probably also have splashed out for a half decent camera. One of his passengers did have a camera with a zoom lens, I wonder what he was seeing?


Meanwhile "Miles Mathis" has posted some content about the fires. No I don't think Miles Mathis is a fully legit or trustworthy source, but at least he asks some questions.


"That's the beach in Malibu, near Palisades, on Pacific Coast Highway. How in the name of all that is holy did a wildfire get down there, run downhill toward the ocean, toward the sea breeze, on rock and dirt with no vegetation, and then selectively burn houses?"


Yes, there may really have been some fires, but honestly, what we are being shown is at least 90% utter crap 



Tuesday, 14 January 2025

NZ'S FILTHY GREY SUMMER

The geoengineering in New Zealand since the start of 2025 has been beyond anything I've ever seen in my lifetime. Pretty much every day has been cold and wet with a filthy looking fake dark grey sky. That is just not how summer usually is in NZ and it's pretty clear that the globalists have cranked their relentless sabotage of our country's climate up to 11.

Here are 15 links with information on geoengineering that were recently shared with me - apparently "utility fog" is of particular interest but I haven't checked out any of these links yet:

1. Operational Defenses through Weather Control in 2030:https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA539515.pdf
2. The Weather Machine from the Foresight Institute  J Storrs Hall https://foresight.org/the-weather-machine/
3. Utility Fog: The Stuff Nightmares are made Of/ J Storrs Hall https://autogeny.org/Ufog.html
4 The Space Pier/ J Storrs Hall https://autogeny.org/tower/tower.html
5. J Storrs Hall on video talking about the Weather Machine. https://youtu.be/Fd63OMosnq0?si=5dn2tBpzr4RIkLBx
7. Just a little history of J Storrs Hall https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Storrs_Hall
8. A Modern Review of ANTShttps://joshschertz.com/.../papers/Modern-Review-of-ANTS.pdf
11.Modern and prospective technologies for weather modification activities: A look at integrating unmanned aircraft systemshttps://www.researchgate.net/.../57dc860708ae.../download...
12 . Controlling the Weather 2025. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA333462.pdf

15.https://www.fs.usda.gov/nrs/pubs/gtr/gtr_nrs200-2021.pdf